Maximizing System Performance: A Guide to Top CI Tools in Software Development

Continuous Integration(CI) tools, utilized by major companies like Amazon, Walmart, and Netflix, play a pivotal role in managing workflows, cutting costs, and refining system processes. Tech consultants also recommend these tools for boosting performance and mitigating risk. CI/CD stands for Continuous Integration and Continuous Deployment.

Understanding CI/CD

CI is monitored through CI servers and version control systems such as Jenkins and GitLab, which keep track of changes in the repository or code. Automated testing, including unit and module tests, verifies the quality and elimination of bugs in the newly implemented code.

Once a build succeeds, the CI server labels your latest commit and generates the build. A notification message or an email is sent to the developer if the build is successful, or in the case of failure, the developer is informed of the error message or log relating to the failure. Successful builds are then moved to the staging phase and subjected to integration and load tests before being deployed to production.

Importance of CI Tools

Before the advent of CI tools, software engineers had to manually merge their code with the central repository. This hampered productivity and resulted in numerous implementation and merging errors. However, CI tools eliminate such complications by detecting and resolving issues earlier, thereby, enhancing system performance and minimizing the risk of errors.

Choosing the right CI solution tailored to your business demands careful consideration of the following factors;

  1. Existing tools
  2. Simplicity in setup
  3. Integration with cloud solutions
  4. Full-featured HTTP-based APIs
  5. Notification options

Let’s explore some potent CI tools.

Buddy

Buddy is a web-based CI tool for automating the generation of code builds. It offers an array of features such as smart change detection, managing DevOps workflows, accessing history and logs, and integration with variety of tools including AWS, Azure, WordPress, and Shopify.

Bamboo

Bamboo is an Atlassian CI tool for automating software releases and performing DevOps operations. It integrates with project management tools such as JIRA and Trello, offering a one-stop solution for project delivery pipeline streamlining.

Semaphore

Semaphore is a hosted CI solution widely used for automated software development and testing. It enables project collaboration, native integration, and provides developers the ability to conduct custom unit and acceptance tests.

Jenkins

Jenkins caters to automation of projects, running tests, and bug debugging. It is compatible with multiple operating systems like Windows, macOS, and Linux.

TeamCity

TeamCity is an excellent CI tool by JetBrains, compatible with Linux and Windows. It facilitates the development and running of pipelines in Java and also provides an option for testing code in parallel builds.

CruiseControl

CruiseControl is an extensible, open-source CI tool for managing custom workflows. It can be used to build multiple projects on a single server and can be integrated with version control tools such as Git and VSS.

CircleCI

CircleCI is a CI tool for managing builds and deployments. It uses YAML files for pipeline creation and real-time validation of code. It offers an automated, customizable, and scalable solution for software development and testing.

Choosing the right CI tool will allow developers to detect errors swiftly, manage workflows, and create high-performing systems. Thus, they are a vital part of custom software development and tech best practices.

Tags: #ContinuousIntegration #CITools #SystemOptimization #SoftwareDevelopment

Reference Link

Enhancing Cloud-native Application Security through SSCs and DevSecOps CI/CD Pipelines

In recent times, the digital world has seen a surge in software attacks and vulnerabilities, forcing government and private-sector organizations to place a microscope over the entirety of the software development life cycle (SDLC). This focus has led to the concept of a software supply chain (SSC), essentially a collection of activities that cumulatively contribute to the overall security of an SSC.

In the contemporary software landscape, cloud-native applications primarily consist of loosely coupled components, otherwise known as microservices. These applications usually subscribe to an agile SDLC practice known as DevSecOps, which utilizes continuous integration/continuous delivery (CI/CD) pipelines. However, the security integrity of these pipelines has been a cause for concern, with threats originating from both deliberate and unintentional sources.

The Role of Executive Orders and Frameworks in Software Security

Government initiatives and industry forums have put forth measures to combat this issue and enhance the security of all deployed software. An example is Executive Order (EO) 14028 and NIST’s Secure Software Development Framework (SSDF). However, these measures and instructions need to be actionable for organizations developing and deploying cloud-native applications.

As a response, efforts are now being concentrated on integrating SSC security assurance into the DevSecOps CI/CD pipelines. This integration aims to provide organizations with practical measures to address SSC security, which would enhance the safety of their respective digital footprints.

Open for Public Comments

The public is invited to comment on the proposals until October 13, 2023. Such discussions will aid in refining these measures and taking into account the collective wisdom of software security experts and organizations at large.

Moreover, the document entertains calls for patent claims as noted on page ii of the draft. More information on this aspect can be found under the Information Technology Laboratory (ITL) Patent Policy – Inclusion of Patents in ITL Publications.

As we continue to navigate the digital age, efforts such as these underscore the need for rigorous software security measures. The integration of SSC security assurance measures into CI/CD pipelines in the DevSecOps context paves the way for a more secure and resilient digital space.

Tags: #SoftwareSecurity, #DevSecOps, #CI/CDPipelines, #CloudNativeApplications

Reference Link

Understanding Serverless Computing: Evolution, Applications and Future Challenges

Serverless computing is an emerging technological advancement in IT infrastructure that effectively automate its operations and provide more efficiency. Despite its popularity, the term “serverless” still lacks a cohesive definition and is often not understood completely when compared to other established IT services such as Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS), Platform-as-a-Service (PaaS), and Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) clouds. Hence, this article aims to dissect the nuances of serverless computing and provide a comprehensive understanding of its applications and future prospects.

What is Serverless Computing?

A comparison of IT services and moving homesA comparison of IT services and moving homes
The term serverless computing is often used to describe a situation where the development and running of cloud applications do not require server management. However, such phrasing leaves much room for interpretation, thereby leading to misunderstanding and confusion. This article attempts to provide a concrete and precise definition of serverless computing, tracing its historical evolution and discussing its practical applications.

Dissecting Serverless Computing

Popular definitions of serverless computingPopular definitions of serverless computing
There are several definitions of serverless computing, but they do not provide a unanimous agreement. These existing definitions fail to encapsulate the central aspects of this new technology in a clear, unambiguous manner. To address this issue, we propose a refined definition of serverless computing, characterized by cloud computing platforms that allow applications to run without allocating and managing servers and resources. It also offloads responsibility for operational aspects such as fault tolerance or elastic scaling of resources to the cloud provider.

The Evolution Towards Serverless Computing

Sixty years of technological evolution toward serverless computingSixty years of technological evolution toward serverless computing
Dating back to the 1950s, the process of computing has come a long way, from mainframe virtualization in the 1960s through grid and cloud computing to serverless computing today. Severless computing is a high-level, applicable term that can be applied at many levels, including functions, containers, middleware, and backend services.

Future of Serverless Computing: Outlook and Challenges

Despite the benefits and growing adoption of serverless computing, it also faces a range of challenges, including performance, security, programming and applications. Moreover, the increasing diversity of serverless offerings and blurry boundaries between different cloud service models further necessitates clear understanding of the concept.

Conclusion

A depiction of the potential of serverless computingA depiction of the potential of serverless computing
The notion of serverless computing is undergoing various transformations. The critical emphasis of cloud platforms continues to shift towards automation, fine-grained resource usage, and focus on operational aspects of the cloud service, thereby gradually metamorphosing the landscape of cloud computing.

#serverless #computing #cloud #technology #IT-infrastructure
Reference Link

Maximizing Business Efficiency with Serverless Architectures: Future Trends and Market Growth

With the recent surge in digital transformation across industries, businesses are increasingly looking for ways to streamline operations, enhance efficiency, and reduce costs. A revolutionary development that promises to cater to these demands is the serverless architecture. This article explores the implications of this paradigm shift and its transformative potential for businesses.

Understanding the Efficacy of a Serverless Architecture

Serverless architecture is a cutting-edge methodology for creating and running applications without managing the backend infrastructure. In stark contrast to traditional infrastructural models where businesses must maintain and provision servers for their applications, a serverless architecture eliminates this operational burden.

Serverless architectures provide significant cost reduction and improved efficiency by eliminating the need for server management and provisioning. With serverless, the pricing is carefully calibrated against the actual usage of your code, thus making it incredibly cost-effective. Moreover, it offers automatic scaling, high availability, and a reduction in operational complexity.

A Deep Dive into the Types of Serverless Architecture

Serverless architecture comes in various forms, subject to the specific use cases and business requirements. These include:

  1. Function as a Service (FaaS)
  2. Backend as a Service (BaaS)
  3. Composite Serverless Applications

Making sense of Serverless Architecture – How Does It Work?

The essence of a serverless architecture lies in avoiding the underlying infrastructure management, thus enabling businesses to focus on their application code. A quick look at the Function as a Service (FaaS) will clarify this:

  • Application Decomposition
  • Event Trigger
  • Function Execution

Reaping the Benefits of Serverless Architecture

Embracing serverless architecture comes with an array of benefits for businesses and application development:

  • Auto Scaling
  • Pay-per-Use Pricing
  • Managed Infrastructure

Benefits of Serverless Architecture

Exploring the Growth of the Serverless Architecture Market

The global serverless architecture market experienced significant growth, with the market size surpassing USD 7.6 billion in 2020. Expected to grow at a robust CAGR of 22.7%, it is projected to reach USD 21.1 billion by 2026.

The global serverless architecture market has witnessed significant growth, with its size surpassing USD 7.6 billion in 2020. It is projected to experience a robust CAGR of 22.7% and reach USD 21.1 billion by 2026.

Who Is Serverless For?

Serverless architecture can bring notable advantages for a broad spectrum of use cases, businesses and developers:

  • Startups and Small Businesses
  • Event-Driven Applications
  • Microservices Architecture
  • DevOps and Agile Development
  • Burstable Workloads and Spikes in Traffic
  • Prototyping and MVP Development
  • Cost-Conscious Applications

Future Trends & Innovations in Serverless Architecture

The future of serverless architecture looks promising with advancements in emerging technologies like machine learning. Also, event-driven architectures are gaining significant momentum, leading to highly efficient and scalable systems.

Conclusion: Stay Ahead of The Curve with Serverless Architecture

With serverless architecture expected to grow at a CAGR of 26% from 2023 to 2032, it is primed to reshape the digital landscape profoundly. It offers businesses an efficient way to enhance productivity, deliver faster and more responsive applications, and reduce operational costs. To stay ahead of the curve, organizations should explore the transformative potential of serverless architecture for their operations and assess the best implementation approach suitable for their specific requirements.

Contact us today!

Tags: #ServerlessArchitecture, #DigitalTransformation, #ApplicationDevelopment, #EmergingTechnologies

Reference Link

Exploring Innovation and Overcoming Challenges in Serverless Architecture

Serverless architecture, also known as cloud computing execution model, has been widely adopted due to its efficiency and cost-effectiveness. It allows developers to build and run applications and services without concerning about the server infrastructure management.

The Evolution

Serverless computing model feels like you are using a software-as-a-service application within your application architecture. It’s designed to take the distractions away and help developers focus on coding. One of its most admired features is functions-as-a-service (FaaS) or cloud functions. This is where you can run your server-side software without worrying about server infrastructure such as Kubernetes clusters or virtual machines. AWS Lambda, known for FaaS, is quite popular among serverless users, yet there is more to serverless than only AWS Lambda.

Flavors of Serverless

Recently, application hosting becoming more specialized is seen as a new trend in serverless. Services like Vercel or Netlify, which host your websites or Next JS applications, are examples where they manage your applications for you and still are considered serverless.

Some users refrain from writing much custom server-side code and rely on independent custom services. They use a third-party authentication system instead of their databases and libraries. Joe Emison, who is exploring this concept in his upcoming book, is one such enthusiast. He integrates numerous third-party services through a front-end application to depict a modern way of using serverless.

Enterprise-ification of Serverless

While serverless is hot in the market, its definition is going through a wave of changes. One such emerging trend is the “enterprise-ification” of serverless. An array of serverless-ish version of services being launched by Amazon is an example of that. These services, even though automated, don’t have a zero-cost floor, raising questions on their “serverless” tag.

Enhanced Features

Lambda, to cater increasing demands, has added several features some of which are SnapStart (to reduce cold start times) and an option to lock down the runtime version. These additions are meant to entice developers to run more workloads on Lambda.

Serverless Development and Challenges

Serverless development has its unique challenges. Common misconceptions like major changes in CI/CD with serverless are rampant. However, it’s the application architecture needing major revisions due to the removal of always-on servers.

Choosing the granularity of the service also generates debate among serverless developers. Should an application with 20 tasks have 20 Lambda functions or one function managing all 20 tasks? Seems like a simple question but the answer varies significantly.

Furthermore, the costs of serverless may seem higher due to visible pricing models but the overall cost, including the reduced labor in managing the Kubernetes environments, may be more cost-effective.

Wrapping Up

Serverless brings in a dramatic shift in how applications are built and managed. The complexity and costs associated are less tangible and upfront. However, the agility, scalability, and cost-effectiveness make it a worthy consideration. Architecting applications with serverless may take time initially but the long-term benefits are immense.

Tags: #ServerlessArchitecture, #AWSServerless, #LambdaFunctions, #EnterpriseServerless

Reference Link

2023 Review: Trends and Evolution of Serverless Adoption & Technologies

As we witness the continual rise of serverless technologies, it’s worth noting the highlights that stand out from the year as seen in key surveys. The technology remains at the forefront with the rapid adoption of cloud platforms and services by organizations across industries and sizes.

The Upswing of Serverless Adoption

In an annual survey by CNCF, a clear paradigm shift towards serverless computing has been noted over the years. Paradigm shifts in tech, as history has shown us with Functional Programming (FP) and NoSQL databases, are not easy and usually take longer than expected to penetrate mainstream thinking. However, the adoption of serverless technologies is indeed visible and gaining momentum.

As seen in Datadog’s survey, Node.js, and Python continue to be the dominant languages for AWS Lambda, the most common type of serverless workload. An increase in using Java has been observed owing to enterprise organizations finally moving towards serverless technologies.

Customer Trends and Serverless

Datadog’s customer trends reflect a diverse use of different cloud platforms and services. However, it’s important to note a certain bias in the results, resulting from the source of the data, which is largely from Datadog’s customer base. Despite being quite extensive, it can’t function as a perfect representation of the entire global market.

When looking at serverless adoption, Datadog’s focus extends beyond serverless functions to include managed container applications and edge functions. On AWS, for instance, an organization is considered serverless if it has adopted Lambda, App Runner, Fargate, or CloudFront Functions.

Looking Ahead

Despite seeming like old news to some industry observers, the continual normalization and standardization of serverless are noteworthy trends. For larger organizations using AWS Lambda, Terraform is leading the way, mainly due to their hybrid workloads. Interestingly, Frontend development is spearheading the creation of new serverless platforms, further highlighting the need for cloud providers to improve their DX for these services.

In conclusion, the momentum that serverless technologies have gained signals a shift in the industry. As more companies adopt these technologies, it will be intriguing to monitor how the serverless landscape evolves.

About the Author:

Renato Losio is a seasoned cloud architect and tech lead with specialization in cloud services and relational databases. Presently, he splits his time between Berlin and Trieste, while working remotely as a principal cloud architect. He also contributes as an editor at InfoQ and is an AWS Data Hero. You can find him on LinkedIn.

Tags

#Serverless #AWSLambda #CloudComputing #TechnologyTrends

Reference Link

Exploring Serverless vs Microservices: Future Trends in Software Development and Cloud Computing

In planning for the future of a software development project, it’s vital to have a firm understanding of the underlying architecture that will shape the project’s trajectory. Specifically, business owners need to decide on an architecture that ensures agility, scalability, and performance. Among the front-runners for scalable solutions are two distinctive models: serverless and microservices.

The Microservices Model – A Brief Overview

The microservices architecture is, essentially, a decentralized application that has been partitioned into several modules, often referred to as services. Each of these services is tasked with executing a specific function. Generally, these services are specialized to perform a singular task exceptionally well.

The Serverless Model – A Quick Summary

Serverless architecture, as its name implies, eschews the need for your company to maintain its server space. Instead, a third-party vendor handles all the internal operations – storage, security, computing capabilities, among others – which could lead to significant cost reductions.

Key Differences: Serverless vs Microservices

Understanding the fundamental differences between these two architectures requires a detailed examination of several factors, such as functions, IT operations, cost, and runtime.

Functions

While both models have their unique sets of functions, the serverless model employs short-term functions that run based on specific conditions. Conversely, a microservices function is broader, often handling related processes simultaneously.

IT Operations

In the microservices model, the development team undertakes monitoring, deployment, support, and maintenance, whereas serverless architecture relies heavily on third-party vendors.

Cost

The cost of developing microservices tends to be higher initially, primarily because it demands several teams and meticulous planning. On the other hand, serverless architecture, with its shared resources and the absence of hardware specialists, is typically cheaper.

Runtime

Serverless functions have limited runtime, contingent on the provider’s specific limitations. Alternatively, microservices aren’t limited by runtime, storage space, or RAM, making them more suitable for complex long-term operations.

Combining Serverless and Microservices Architectures

The rapid evolution in technology has presented development teams with the opportunity to leverage both the serverless and microservice architectures concurrently. By hosting a set of event-driven services (microservices) on a third-party infrastructure (serverless), companies can significantly enhance their scalability, flexibility, and cost-efficiency.

Advantages of Adopting Serverless Architecture

Serverless architectures offer several benefits, including easy deployment, reduced cost, heightened scalability and flexibility, decreased latency, and Function as a Service (FaaS). It also frees companies from potentially risky investment in excessive server spaces by offering access to vast computing resources owned by large technology corporations.

Advantages of Adopting Microservices Architecture

Adopting a microservices architecture comes with its share of advantages, such as the decentralization of tasks, reduced risks, and most notably, scalability. This model aligns well with modern management methodologies like Agile and DevOps and fosters a culture of responsibility and ownership among small development teams.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. Is serverless architecture the future?

    Serverless architecture is indeed seen as the future of cloud computing and software development models. It provides an automated solution to managing cloud computing resources, eliminating the need for users to estimate the required resources for their workload.

  2. What is the next trend in microservices?

    Trends such as serverless architecture, Cloud adoption, and DevOps are expected to shape the microservices industry’s future.

#complete

Tags: #Serverless, #Microservices, #SoftwareDevelopment, #CloudComputing

Reference Link

Exploring the Pros and Cons of Serverless Computing in IT Infrastructure

In the realm of information technology, serverless computing has been making headlines, provoking discussions, and challenging traditional software engineering practices. Given its rising popularity, it’s crucial to understand the strengths, weaknesses, and application areas of this novel computing model.

Decoding Serverless Computing

Serverless computing is a cloud-based technology that allows businesses to execute their code without having to manage the underlying infrastructure. From scalability and maintenance to pricing, serverless computing radically departs from traditional cloud-based solutions such as the server, Cloud, and Platform as a service (PaaS).

Is Serverless Computing the Ultimate Problem Solver?

Many businesses view serverless computing as a magic bullet for their software engineering challenges. Several case studies, like the AWS Coca-Cola one, suggest significant reduction in operational costs and IT ticket volumes post migration to this architecture model. However, it’s important to remember that serverless computing is not a universal solution. Like any other technology, it comes with its fair share of challenges and limitations.

Unraveling the Downsides of Serverless Computing

While serverless computing can streamline multiple aspects of IT operations, some potential disadvantages could deter organizations from implementing it.

Lack of Control

By opting for serverless computing, businesses relinquish control over server hardware, execution environments, and updates, potentially complicating certain processes or applications.

Potential Performance Issues

In serverless computing, the processing times can fluctuate dramatically between runs due to the variable server specifications.

Security Risks

The “multi-tenancy” nature of serverless computing can potentially compromise the security and performance of applications.

Higher Costs for Long Processes

Serverless computing charges users based on code runtime, which could translate into higher overall costs for long-running applications.

Testing and Debugging Challenges

In serverless computing, developers might struggle to reproduce the production environment locally for testing. Debugging also becomes a complex task due to the lack of visibility into backend processes.

Should You Adopt Serverless Computing?

Despite the noted disadvantages, serverless computing can be an optimal choice in numerous instances. Businesses dealing with unpredictable server loads, requiring seamless scalability, or those in the early development stages might find serverless architectures a perfect fit.

Transformations via Serverless Computing: Noteworthy Use Cases

Several big guns in the industry, such as Slack, GreenQ, Coca-Cola, and HomeAway, have experienced successful transformations by embracing serverless computing. Each of these renowned establishments has utilized serverless solutions to address particular business needs, ranging from real-time travel recommendations to robust IoT platform establishment.

Serverless Computing vs. The Alternatives

When contemplating serverless, it’s essential to understand how it fares against its alternatives like servers, Cloud computing, and PaaS.

Serverless vs Cloud Computing

While Cloud computing necessitates Internet-based access to computing resources hosted by third-party providers, serverless computing takes it a notch higher by eliminating any concerns related to the management of these resources. It’s essentially a subsidiary of Cloud computing.

Serverless vs Server

Contrary to servers, serverless solutions allow for adaptable scalability and automated maintenance, with a pay-as-you-use payment model.

Serverless vs PaaS

While PaaS assures complete development and deployment in a cloud-based environment, serverless computing enables dynamic price adjustment based on usage. However, serverless tends to restrict control, complicating the testing and debugging of applications.

Wrapping Up

In essence, serverless computing is a significant milestone in the evolution of cloud services. While its benefits are compelling, they must be weighed against its demerits and the specific needs of your project. Carefully evaluate your operational requirements, IT capabilities, security regulations, budget constraints, and future aspirations before making a decision.

Remember, the most effective technology is the one that aligns with your specific needs and long-term business goals.

Tags: #ServerlessComputing #CloudServices #ITInfrastructure #SoftwareEngineering

Reference Link

Top 5 Serverless Platforms of 2023: An In-Depth Comparison and Review

As the demand for efficient computing infrastructure continues to grow, businesses are moving away from managing their own server infrastructure and transitioning to serverless computing. This shift allows for enhanced agility, scalability, and overall performance. However, choosing the right serverless provider is a critical decision that can impact the success of your project.

In this post, we’ll delve into the top five serverless platforms of 2023, comparing them in terms of price, advantages, and potential limitations. Our hope is to assist you on your journey to finding a serverless infrastructure provider that matches your project’s size, needs, expertise, and future expansion goals.

Defining Serverless Platforms

A serverless platform primarily takes care of managing server performance. Thus, opting for the right vendor becomes crucial. Main characteristics of serverless platforms include abstraction, flexibility, and cost-efficiency. These platforms allow you to focus on applications and services while your provider manages the underlying infrastructure.

AWS Lambda

Pricing

The free tier supports one million requests in 400,000 seconds per month. The premium version is charged on a per-request and per-second basis: $0.20 for one million requests and 0.000016667 for 1 GB per second.

Advantages

  • Pay-as-you-go pricing model
  • No need to manage infrastructure
  • Seamless code deployment
  • Connection to the API gateway

Disadvantages

  • Limited control of the environment
  • Complex call patterns
  • Computation limitations

Use cases

Lambda is used and supported by many software development tools like Asana, CicrleCI, and InVisionApp.

Google Cloud Functions + Firebase

Pricing

Offers pay-as-you-go pricing based on function execution time.

Advantages

  • Cost-effective for small tasks
  • Instant updates

Disadvantages

  • May be unreliable at times

Use cases

Companies like Lucille Games and Smart Parking have found use in Google Cloud Functions + Firebase.

Microsoft Azure

Pricing

Azure uses a pay-as-you-go model and offers a price calculator to help determine costs.

Advantages

  • Robust cybersecurity
  • Multiple scalability options

Disadvantages

  • Requires knowledge on server management
  • Lower-performance speed

Use cases

Companies like HP and Asos have utilized Microsoft Azure for advanced AI serverless operations.

Alibaba Functions

An event-driven serverless platform for code development and updates.

Pricing

$19 for a month of using a Linux-based instance with 2 GB memory and one CPU.

Advantages

  • Easy trigger mechanism
  • Access to Chinese nods
  • Supports popular development languages like Node.js

Disadvantages

  • Higher price
  • Limited number of APIs
  • No active English-speaking community

Use cases

Brands like Ford and Air Asia have employed Alibaba Functions in their workflow.

IBM Bluemix/OpenWhisk

A platform for event-triggered applications with flexible components for web-based projects.

Pricing

IBM charges $0.000017 for an executed second, utilizing a pay-per-use system.

Advantages

  • Flexibility
  • Command line control
  • Web IDE

Disadvantages

  • A complicated user interface
  • Product bugs and technical limitations
  • Lack of competent technical support

Use cases

Companies like American Airlines and Ubank have implemented IBM Bluemix/OpenWhisk.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the future of Serverless?

Serverless technology has disrupted the IT sector, allowing developers to focus on delivering value rather than maintaining systems.

What is Serverless Computing?

Serverless Computing allows developers to focus on code while cloud-based services handle scaling and maintenance at run-time.

Is Serverless same as SaaS?

Though often confused, serverless is about eliminating server management while SaaS is about providing access to a provider’s applications over an internet connection.

Serverless platforms offer scalability, improved productivity, and cost-efficiency, and choosing the right one can indeed be a game-changer. The best decision hinges on understanding the specific needs of your project and finding a vendor that can match those needs accurately.

Tags: #ServerlessPlatforms, #CloudServices, #AWSLambda, #GoogleCloudFunctions, #Azure, #AlibabaFunctions, #Bluemix
Reference Link

Snapshot Testing in React Native: A Comprehensive Guide with Jest

In this guide, we will delve into the world of snapshot testing in React Native going through, first, an overview of the Jest framework and then, how snapshot testing can be incorporated in your React Native application.

Using Jest for Testing in React Native

Jest is a very common testing library when it comes to React and React-Native due to its simplicity and the integrated snapshot testing feature. In order to initialize jest in your project, you can use react-native init. This will setup your test script and jest preset in your package.json as seen below.

{
  "scripts": {
    "test": "jest"
  },
  "jest": {
    "preset": "react-native"
  }
}

To test if Jest has been correctly set up, simply run yarn test. Jest should run and pass without any tests.

Snapshot Testing in Action

Snapshot tests are a very useful characteristic when you want to make sure your UI does not change unexpectedly. A snapshot test will capture a snapshot of your component and compares it to a reference snapshot file stored alongside your tests. Let’s illustrate this with a Intro component.

import React, {Component} from 'react';
import {StyleSheet, Text, View} from 'react-native';

class Intro extends Component{
  render(){
    return(
      <View style={styles.container}>
          <Text style={styles.welcome}> Welcome to React Native!</Text>
          <Text style={styles.instructions}>This is a React Native snapshot test.</Text>
      </View>
    );
  }
}

const styles = StyleSheet.create({
  container: {
    alignItems: 'center',
    backgroundColor: '#F5FCFF',
    flex: 1,
    justifyContent: 'center',
  },
  instructions: {
    color: '#333333',
    marginBottom: 5,
    textAlign: 'center',
  },
  welcome: {
    fontSize: 20,
    margin: 10,
    textAlign: 'center',
  },
});

export default Intro;

To create the snapshot for this component, we will make use of React’s test renderer and Jest’s snapshot feature. We will build a generic test that will render our component and compare it with the snapshot.

import React from 'react';
import renderer from 'react-test-renderer';
import Intro from '../Intro';

test('renders correctly', () => {
    const tree = renderer.create(<Intro/>).toJSON();
    expect(tree).toMatchSnapshot();
});

We run this test with yarn test. Jest will then create a snapshot file which records the current state of the component. The snapshot file would look like something as below.

exports[`Intro renders correctly 1`] = `
<View style={ { "alignItems": "center", "backgroundColor": "#F5FCFF", "flex": 1, "justifyContent": "center", }}>
  <Text style={ { "fontSize": 20, "margin": 10, "textAlign": "center", }}>Welcome to React Native!</Text>
  <Text style={ { "color": "#333333", "marginBottom": 5, "textAlign": "center", }}>This is a React Native snapshot test.</Text>
</View>
`;

Congratulations! You have now created your first snapshot test. Every subsequent run of the test will compare the rendered output with this snapshot. If the output is different, the test will fail.

To update the snapshot, you can use the -u flag as jest -u.

Conclusion

In this guide, we took a dive into snapshot testing in React Native with Jest. Snapshot tests provide a great way to ensure your UI does not change unexpectedly, further ensuring the stability of your application.

However, snapshot testing does not replace good old unit testing. These tests should be seen as an additional layer to validate your application’s UI logic.

Tags

react-native, jest, snapshot-testing, react-component

Reference Link